.

LSE humiliated in the High Court and media,

retaliates against innocent victim with illegal defamation

BREAKING NEWS #1:

Innocent, award-winning, internationally-renowned economist

files million pound lawsuit against the LSE and Daily Mail

Senior LSE Administrator, Joanne Hay

International Institute for Strategic LeadershipHome.html

Lawyers and Law firms responsible for the

Largest Defamation Lawsuit in Higher Education

Joanne Hay, Deputy Chief Operating Officer of the LSE is alleged to have made a drunken sexual assault against an award-winning internationally-renowned economist.

(Note that the LSE refused to investigate the serious grievance against Ms Hay,   ostensibly as an illegal act of sex discrimination).


Ms Hay appears to have harboured a vendetta against the innocent professor for spurning her unwanted advance in a multi-year ongoing campaign of vengeance.


After the High Court judge humiliated Ms Hay for being at the centre of the LSE’s multiple breaches of duty of care and breach of contract against the innocent professor, Ms Hay is believed to be responsible for cowardly defaming the innocent professor in the international media with false and career-ending statements.


As a result, on 11 October 2019, the innocent professor filed a million pound lawsuit

against Ms Hay, the LSE and the Daily Mail.


On 25 October 2018 at 19:56,

two weeks after the defamation lawsuit was filed,

Ms Hay emailed Fran Hannan of LSE HR an email with the subject “Case - today”:

“Hi Fran,

I talked to a few people today and whilst I don’t want to inflate the matter about the court case and issues, I think we need to take some legal advice.

Surely this is vexatious now and why would we be searching e-ms (yet again)?

It wasn’t me who was in touch with the press so.. if they want to search my e-m account - IMT is welcome, I have nothing to hide.

The point is that I think we are past a point.

Joanne”


On 26 October 2018 at 15:13,

two weeks after the defamation lawsuit was filed,

Ms Hay forwarded an email with the subject:

“Case - today” to Cheryl Edwardes and Saul Estrin,

which contained a link to the defamatory article:


“Hi both,

Here are the links.

It’s the 3rd which is the one that I am being accused of being ‘the associate’ in.

Joanne”

BREAKING NEWS #2:

“Master Manipulator” Joanne Hay inflicts self-harm,

then attempts to blame the innocent wife of award-winning professor

Senior LSE Administrator, Joanne Hay

At 10:39 pm on 7 November 2019,

“Master Manipulator” Joanne Hay sent herself an allegedly harassing email,

then forwarded it to her boss, Andrew Young,

who then forwarded it to his boss, Louise Nadal,

who then forwarded it to Julian Sladdin of Pinsent Masons,

who then falsely accused the innocent wife of the innocent award-winning professor

of harassment.


Former Lord Chief Justice Harry Woolf’s damning indictment

of widescale unethical corruption at the LSE

is once again on full display with Ms Hay, Mr Young, Ms Nadal and Mr Sladdin,

which will be exposed once again in the UK High Court and the international media.

BREAKING NEWS #3:

Former LSE Director of Communications, Adrian Thomas sacked*

for mishandling of media in LSE’s High Court humiliation

On 14 March 2017 at 15:05, Adrian Thomas sent an email to LSE COO, Andrew Young

about the largest lawsuits in the history of Higher Education,

which would ultimately cost him his job:*


“Sounds tasty.  Do I need to do anything? I am not sure what!”


On 5 July 2017 at 14:30, Adrian Thomas sent an email to LSE COO, Andrew Young

about the largest lawsuits in the history of Higher Education,

which would ultimately cost him his job.

In the email, he negligently stated that the LSE didn’t need a communications plan

and he incorrectly bet his career that the largest lawsuits in the history of

Higher Education would not end up being covered in the  Evening Standard.

The landmark lawsuits were covered by the Evening Standard, The Times & the Daily Mail.


“We definitely don’t need a comms plan...

I’d say there was an incredibly slim chance of it ending up in the Standard...”


On 5 July 2017 at 15:26, LSE COO, Andrew Young emailed Adrian Thomas

about the LSE Chairperson, Dame Shirley Pearce’s discomfort with

the largest lawsuits in the history of Higher Education:


“Indeed, she is fretting a bit I think.

In her position, I might too.”


In July 2019,

Adrian Thomas became the last in a long-line and growing list of LSE staff

to have apparently lost their job for their negligent and/or unethical handling

of the largest lawsuits in the history of Higher Education.


Mr Thomas was believed to have been heavily-criticised

for the damaging global media coverage

of the largest lawsuits in the history of Higher Education,

and he subsequently presided over

the largest defamation lawsuit in the history of Higher Education.


Mr Thomas now works for a small, little-known charity.


Former Lord Chief Justice Harry Woolf’s damning indictment

of widescale unethical corruption at the LSE is once again on full display with Mr Thomas,

which will be exposed once again in the UK High Court and the international media.

Joanne Hay like other “Master Manipulators” (pictured)

inflicting self-harm and then blaming innocent victims. (Click on photo above for video).

BREAKING NEWS #4:

LSE Secretary Louise Nadal negligently ignored the

million pound defamation lawsuit filed against the LSE

On 9 October 2019 the Claimant offered to settle

the million pound defamation lawsuit against the LSE at effectively no financial cost.


LSE Director Nemat Shafik, LSE Secretary Nadal, LSE COO Young & LSE Deputy COO Hay

all felt it was in the best interest of the LSE to ignore the settlement offer

and allow the million pound defamation lawsuit to proceed.


On 9 October 2019 at 20:31,

LSE Secretary Louise Nadal negligently predicted that the LSE

would not face a million pound defamation lawsuit when she said:


“It is an (un)expected step which I think is intended to make us react.

It is well known that defamation cases are extremely expensive to bring.

It will be interesting to see if they do what they say and present papers to court.”


Two days later on 11 October 2019,

while Ms Nadal was paralysed by negligent inaction,

“they did what they said they would and presented papers to court”,

filing a million pound defamation lawsuit against the LSE.


It appears that the LSE will once again regret its negligence,

and that more senior LSE staff will lose their jobs over this growing scandal.


Former Lord Chief Justice Harry Woolf’s damning indictment

of widescale unethical corruption at the LSE is once again on full display with

LSE Director Nemat Shafik, LSE Secretary Nadal, LSE COO Young & LSE Deputy COO Hay,

which will be exposed once again in the UK High Court and the international media.

Julian Sladdin

(Leeds)


Shamed for:

issuing illegal

groundless threats

against an innocent

disabled autistic man,

falsely accusing an

innocent Oxford Trustee,

and issuing false statements against the media.

*ostensibly

BREAKING NEWS #5:

Innocent, award-winning, internationally-renowned economist

serves particulars of claim in

million pound lawsuit against the LSE and Daily Mail:

Julie Dipuppo Rufo, Joanne Hay and Antonia Hoyle

On 10 February 2020,

a 300-page particulars of claim document in the million pound defamation lawsuit

was sent to the LSE (Joanne Hay and Julie Dipuppo Rufo)

and Associated Newspapers Limited (Antonia Hoyle).

Spurned Drunken Bully

Joanne Hay

Sacked Sex Stalker

Julie Dipuppo Rufo

Tabloid Rag Hack Writer

Antonia Hoyle

Sacked Sex Stalker, Julie Dipuppo Rufo


“i’ve done something wrong… i’ve messed up badly… i am ‘being destructive’... i can’t believe that i’ve messed this up…  i’m such an idiot...

he was absolutely furious with me… he doesn’t trust me, because i’m unstable...

he accused me of doing things to attract him, so i have control over him… 

i use certain behaviours to attract men so that i have control over them...

i’m some kind of evil seductress...”



Spurned Drunken Bully, Joanne Hay


“Joanne was a complete drunken nightmare who was running the Department, and then going out to the restaurant every night after work and drinking £100 worth of wine on the Department’s budget with her staff. That is how that Department was being run, by a couple of drunks who were just wretched people. I have never seen anything like that before in my life. The problem was... Joanne and HR are so awful at their jobs, that within a few months you have so much material to sue them with... because they have left themselves open to huge lawsuits. How could they not have gotten rid of her?” (LSE Professor)



Tabloid Rag Hack Writer*, Antonia Hoyle


“When I became a tabloid newspaper reporter, I’d instinctively unwind

after work with a bottle or two of chardonnay.

The next day - I’d sometimes still be drunk.”

Forgetful, anxious and flighty... I still left the house with my pants on inside out.”


*A tabloid rag is a newspaper that emphasizes sensational gossip and crime stories about celebrities.  A hack writer is a writer who is paid to write low-quality, rushed articles ‘to order’, often with a short deadline.



Postscript: Pinsent Masons Lawyer, Julian Sladdin, Lies to Claimant


Mr Sladdin repeatedly informed the Claimant

on 11 October 2019 at 11:16 am and on 15 November 2019 at 16:42 pm:

“We act for the LSE and Ms Hay.

Please note our interest and refer further communications to us.”


After Mr Sladdin received the particulars of claim from the Claimant,

he then made the following unethical statement on 13 February 2020:

“You did not seek confirmation that this firm was instructed to receive service of any legal proceedings on behalf of any of the defendants, or invite us to seek such instruction, before taking this step. 

We should advise you that we have not been instructed to receive service of any proceedings (by any medium) on behalf of any of the defendants, at any time, and therefore receipt by this firm of your e-mail or hard copy pleadings is not valid service under the Civil Procedure Rules.”


Clearly Mr Sladdin appears to be an unprofessional, unethical liar.

Susan Aslan